Graves' disease-induced immune thrombocytopenic purpura in an African female: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura is a condition associated with an unusual, unexplained, and sometimes very severe reduction in the level of platelets in the blood. Though documented, its association with Graves' disease is not very common and can easily be missed or misdiagnosed, leading to excessive bleeding and mortality. Treatment with steroids and antithyroid medications has been shown to be beneficial in correcting thrombocytopenia in these patients, although the response is varied. We report on a patient with Graves' disease who presents with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old Ghanaian female presented to our hospital's emergency department with a complaint of palpitations, difficulty breathing, easy fatigue, and headaches. She had been referred from a peripheral hospital as a case of thrombocytopenia, severe anemia, and anterior neck swelling. She was diagnosed with Graves' disease 2 years ago, became euthyroid during treatment, but defaulted. On further examination and investigation, she was diagnosed with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and was also found to have elevated free T3 and T4, and suppressed thyroid stimulating hormone. She also had high thyroid autoantibodies. She was initially started on oral prednisolone but there was no stabilization of platelets until methimazole was introduced, which improved and normalized her platelet count. CONCLUSION: The association of Graves' disease with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, though documented, is uncommon, and very few cases have been reported thus far. There have not been any reported cases in Ghana or Sub-Saharan Africa and hence, clinicians should be aware of this association when investigating immune thrombocytopenic purpura and should consider Graves' disease as a possible cause. From this study, we observed that there was no improvement in platelet count following the use of corticosteroid therapy until methimazole was started.

COVID-19: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

In late February 2021, a prothrombotic syndrome was encountered for the first time in some of the recipients of ChAdOx1 CoV-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca, University of Oxford, and Serum Institute of India). Since the hallmark of this syndrome is the development of thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis between 4 and 42 days after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, it was named vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Other names include "vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia" and "thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome" by the Centers for Disease Control and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VITT appears similar to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in that "platelet activating" autoantibodies are produced in both these conditions due to prior exposure of COVID-19 vaccine and heparin respectively, in turn causing thrombotic complications and consumptive thrombocytopenia. In this article, recent advances in the understanding of pathobiology, clinical features, investigative work-up, and management of VITT are reviewed.

Evans syndrome as initial presentation of COVID-19 infection: A case report and review of the literature / Le syndrome d'Evans comme présentation initiale du Covid-19 : à propos d'un cas et revue de la littérature

Evans syndrome (ES) is a rare and chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the concomitant or sequential association of auto-immune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and less frequently autoimmune neutropenia. Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) may cause various hematologic conditions. COVID-19 may also induce Evans syndrome via immune mechanisms. Here, we describe the case of a patient developing Evans syndrome as initial presentation of Covid-19 infection.

Diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia, including secondary forms, and selection of second-line treatment.

This article summarizes our approach to the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), its secondary forms, and choice of second-line treatment options. We very briefly summarize first-line treatment and then utilize a case-based approach. We first explore persistent, chronic ITP in a younger female. We consider many possibilities beyond primary ITP e.g., hypogammaglobulinemia, chronic infection, and anemia, and how to approach their diagnosis and management. The journey continues throughout pregnancy and the post-partum period and eventually includes fourth-line treatment after a late relapse. We then consider an older male, emphasizing differences in diagnostic considerations and management. The focus is on initiation and continuation of second-line treatment, the pros and cons of each option, and briefly the impact of treatment choices related to the endemic presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. During the review of potential second-line treatment options, we also briefly touch upon novel treatments. Finally, there is a short section on refractory disease drawn from our previous extensive review published in February 2020.1 The clinical nature of the discussions, replete with figures and tables and with the interspersion of pearls regarding efficacy and toxicity at different ages and genders, will serve the reader in the management of "typical" adult patients who develop persistent and chronic ITP.

Anti-PF4 testing for vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT): Results from a NEQAS, ECAT and SSC collaborative exercise in 385 centers worldwide.

BACKGROUND: Vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) following the administration of the AstraZeneca (AZ) ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 vaccine is a well recognized clinical phenomenon. The associated clinical and laboratory features have included thrombosis at unusual sites, thrombocytopenia, raised D-dimer levels and positivity for immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies. OBJECTIVES: A collaborative external quality assessment (EQA) exercise was carried out by distributing five lyophilized samples from subjects with VITT and one from a healthy subject to 500 centers performing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) testing. METHODS: Participating centers employed their locally validated testing methods for HIT assays, with some participants additionally reporting results for VITT modified assays. RESULTS: A total of 385 centers returned results for anti-PF4 immunoassay and functional assays. The ELISA assays used in the detection of anti-PF4 antibodies for the samples distributed had superior sensitivities compared with both the functional assays and the non-ELISA methods. CONCLUSION: ELISA-based methods to detect anti PF4 antibodies have a greater sensitivity in confirmation of VITT compared with functional assays regardless of whether such functional assays were modified to be specific for VITT. Rapid immunoassays should not be employed to detect VITT antibodies.

Simultaneous Occurrence of Immune-Mediated Thrombocytopenia and Myocarditis After mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report.

With the global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, several vaccines were developed; messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have recently been widely used worldwide. However, the incidence of myocarditis following mRNA vaccination is increasing; although the cause of myocarditis has not yet been clearly identified, it is presumed to be caused by a problem in the innate immune system. Immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) after vaccination is rare but has been reported and is also assumed to occur by the same mechanism. We report the first case of simultaneous myocarditis and ITP after mRNA vaccination. A 38-year-old woman presented with chest pain, mild dyspnea, and sweating after vaccination with mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) 4 days prior to admission. Upon admission to the emergency department, cardiac enzymes were elevated; blood test performed 5 months ago showed normal platelet count, but severe thrombocytopenia was observed upon admission. After administration of intravenous immunoglobulin, the platelet count improved; subsequently, myocarditis was observed on endomyocardial biopsy. Thus, myocarditis and ITP were judged to have occurred simultaneously due to the expression of the innate immune system markers after mRNA vaccination. The patient was discharged on day 6 of admission.

The clinical and laboratory diagnosis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but serious adverse syndrome occurring 5 to 30 days after adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, a practical evaluation of clinical assessments and laboratory testing for VITT is needed to prevent significant adverse outcomes as the global use of adenoviral vector vaccines continues. We received the clinical information and blood samples of 156 patients in Canada with a suspected diagnosis of VITT between April and July 2021. The performance characteristics of various diagnostic laboratory tests were evaluated against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)-14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) including a commercial anti-PF4/heparin immunoglobulin G (IgG)/IgA/IgM enzyme immunoassay (EIA, PF4 Enhanced; Immucor), in-house IgG-specific anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/heparin-EIAs, the standard SRA, and the PF4/heparin-SRA. Of those, 43 (27.6%) had serologically confirmed VITT-positive based on a positive PF4-SRA result and 113 (72.4%) were VITT-negative. The commercial anti-PF4/heparin EIA, the in-house anti-PF4-EIA, and anti-PF4/heparin-EIA were positive for all 43 VITT-confirmed samples (100% sensitivity) with a few false-positive results (mean specificity, 95.6%). These immunoassays had specificities of 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.0-98.6), 96.5% (95% CI, 91.2-99.0), and 97.4% (95% CI, 92.4-99.5), respectively. Functional tests, including the standard SRA and PF4/heparin-SRA, had high specificities (100%), but poor sensitivities for VITT (16.7% [95% CI, 7.0-31.4]; and 46.2% [95% CI, 26.6-66.6], respectively). These findings suggest EIA assays that can directly detect antibodies to PF4 or PF4/heparin have excellent performance characteristics and may be useful as a diagnostic test if the F4-SRA is unavailable.

Real-world, single-center experience of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immune thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) relapse following vaccination remains poorly reported in the adult population. OBJECTIVES: This report details real world data from the largest single-center cohort of ITP relapse following severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. METHODS: The vaccination status of 294 patients under active follow-up was reviewed. A total of 17 patients were identified resulting in an incidence of ITP relapse following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in this cohort of 6.6% and an incidence of newly diagnosed ITP following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of 1.4%. RESULTS: Patients were noted to develop marked deviation of platelet count from baseline following vaccination (P =< .0001). Fourteen patients had a prior diagnosis of ITP and median follow-up following diagnosis was 4 years (range 0-45 years). Days from vaccination to presentation ranged from 2-42 (median 14) and the follow-up period was 34 weeks. Fifteen patients (88%) presented with symptoms and all 17 patients developed symptoms during the follow-up period. Nine patients (53%) received a second dose of vaccine during the follow-up period with seven patients (78%) requiring therapeutic support to facilitate second vaccination. Decision to treat patients was multi-factorial and aimed at decreasing bleeding symptoms and obtaining a platelet count >30 × 109 /L. Sixteen patients (94%) required therapeutic intervention and at the end of the follow-up period, four patients (24%) remained unresponsive to treatment with a platelet count <30 × 109 /L. CONCLUSION: Vaccination of ITP patients continues to have important clinical benefit; however, recommendations for patients who relapse remain lacking. This report outlines the real-world patient outcomes in the era of widespread SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Severe Immune Thrombocytopenia after COVID-19 Vaccination: Two Case Reports and a Literature Review.

We herein report two cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). A 69-year-old Japanese man developed severe thrombocytopenia after COVID-19 vaccination. He had oral bleeding and hemoptysis but no thrombotic symptoms. He improved rapidly with oral prednisolone therapy. A 34-year-old Japanese woman had generalized purpura after COVID-19 vaccination. Her platelet count improved rapidly after treatment with prednisolone and eltrombopag. The occurrence of two cases of ITP after COVID-19 vaccination at a single institution suggests that there could be more such undiagnosed cases, especially cases of mild secondary ITP.

Proposal for a New Protocol for the Management of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP).

For many decades immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) was managed using therapies which had not undergone randomised clinical trials and included corticosteroids, immune suppression or splenectomy. These older therapies are associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. These empirical therapies have variable efficacy and well-described side effects for many patients with minimal benefit to the patient. Over the past 10 years there has been a shift away from immune suppression and non-evidence-based therapies towards using treatments with reduced or no immune suppression with an increasing reliance on the recently developed and approved thrombopoietin receptor agonists. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has made it more urgent that we develop non-immune suppressive strategies for ITP. In this commentary we describe our proposal for a contemporary approach to the management of ITP in adults that is based on our hospital practices and published guidelines.

A Case Report of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia After ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination and Heparin Use During Hemodialysis.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but life-threatening complication. VITT strongly mimics heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and shares clinical features. Heparin is commonly used to prevent coagulation during hemodialysis. Therefore, nephrologists might encounter patients needing dialysis with a history of heparin exposure who developed thrombotic thrombocytopenia after vaccination. A 70-year-old male presented with acute kidney injury and altered mental status due to lithium intoxication. He needed consecutive hemodialysis using heparin. Deep vein thrombosis of left lower extremity and accompanying severe thrombocytopenia of 15,000/µL on 24 days after vaccination and at the same time, nine days after heparin use. Anti-platelet factor 4 antibody test was positive. Anticoagulation with apixaban and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusion resolved swelling of his left calf and thrombocytopenia. There were no definitive diagnostic tools capable of differentiating between VITT and HIT in this patient. Although VITT and HIT share treatment with IVIG and non-heparin anticoagulation, distinguishing between VITT and HIT will make it possible to establish a follow-up vaccination plan in a person who has had a thrombocytopenic thrombotic event. Further research is needed to develop the tools to make a clear distinction between the clinical syndromes.

Ultrastructural findings of lung injury due to Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombo- cytopenia (VITT) following COVID-19 vaccination: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare new syndrome occurring after the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine immunization. Patients with VITT are characterized by a variable clinical presentation, likewise also the outcome of these patients is very variable. Here we report the lung ultrastructural findings in the course of VITT of a 58-year-old male patient. Alveoli were mainly dilated, irregular in shape, and occupied by a reticular network of fibrin, while interalveolar septa appeared thickened. The proliferation of small capillaries gave rise to plexiform structures and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis-like features. Near the alveoli occupied by a dense fibrin network, the medium-sized arteries showed a modified wall and an intraluminal thrombus. This scenario looks quite similar to that found during COVID-19, where the lungs suffer from the attack of the antigen-antibodies complexes and the virus respectively. In both diseases, the final outcome is a severe inflammation, activation of the haemostatic system and fibrinolysis.

[Immune thrombocytopenia after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination].

A 95-year-old male developed general subcutaneous petechiae, tongue hematoma, and melena two days after receiving the second BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Two days later, his platelet count decreased to below 1,000/µl. Laboratory testing was positive for a slight increase in D-dimer, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody, lupus anticoagulant, and anticardiolipin IgG antibody levels. There were no severe infections or symptomatic thrombosis. Platelet transfusions were transiently effective. He was diagnosed with newly developed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We administered prednisolone (PSL) at 0.5 mg/kg/day and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) at 0.4 g/kg/day. From the following day, his platelet count rapidly increased, with an improvement in bleeding tendency. H. pylori was eradicated after platelet count recovery. Thrombocytopenia did not relapse although PSL was tapered three months later. Causes of thrombocytopenia after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination include ITP, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Differential diagnosis is important to determine the proper therapy. Case reports of newly diagnosed ITP after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been increasing recently. In these cases, including ours, the responses to steroids and IVIG were good. Further follow-up studies are needed to manage thrombocytopenia following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.